Feedforward and ratio control
In class activities
Activities
- Consider a boiler drum as shown in the figure below
Identify controlled variable, manipulated variable and disturbance
Draw a conventional feedback control to maintain liquid level in the boiler.
What are the drawbacks of this system?
Controlled variable: Boiler drum liquid level.
Manipulated variable: Feedwater flow, via the feedwater control valve or pump speed.
Major disturbances: Steam demand, furnace heat input, drum pressure changes, feedwater pressure or temperature changes, and blowdown flow.
Drawbacks of this simple system:
Poor rejection of steam flow disturbances. A sudden increase in steam demand lowers level before the controller reacts.
Shrink and swell effects. Pressure and boiling changes cause apparent level changes that mislead the controller.
- Consider the operation of heat exchanger to demonstrate the application of feedforward control strategy. Identify all disturbances and the target disturbance to be remove using the feedforward control strategy
Objective: keep outlet temperature at setpoint by manipulating steam flow.
Controlled variable: Outlet temperature,
Manipulated variable: Steam flow to the exchanger.
Important disturbances:
- Feed (inlet) flow rate,
. - Feed (inlet) temperature,
. - Product draw‑off flow changes (level control actions).
- Steam supply pressure/temperature to the valve.
- Exchanger fouling or changes in overall
. - Condensate backpressure or trap performance.
- Pump/recirculation rate variations.
- Ambient heat losses and property changes (
, ).
Target disturbance for feedforward:
- The dominant, measurable load changes: inlet flow
and inlet temperature . Use them to compute the needed steam flow setpoint
- For the blending system shown in Figure 5
Identify controlled variable
Manipulated variable
Disturbance
Propose a feedforward strategy to control outlet composition
Propose a strategy to control composition when inlet flowrate
is fluctuatingpropose a feedforward feedback control strategy
- Identify controlled variable
- Outlet composition x
- Manipulated variable
- the flow of stream 2, w2
- Disturbance
- Stream‑1 flow and composition, w1 and x1
- Stream‑2 composition x2 (and sometimes w2 if it is not the MV)
- Density or temperature changes that affect analyzer or flowmeters
- Propose a feedforward strategy to control outlet composition
- Propose a strategy to control composition when inlet flowrate
is fluctuating
- propose a feedforward feedback control strategy
The process, and disturbance transfer functions for problem 1 are given by
use PID tuner app to tune a PID controller for this process.
Propose a feedforward control system for Figure 1. Explain how a feedforward control can improve disturbance rejection or regulatory control performance.
Calculate ideal feedforward compensator for problem 1 and implement pure feedforward control scheme in simulink.
Draw a combined feedforward-feedback PID for Figure 1. Implement feedforward-feedback system in simulink.
Consider the following process and disturbance transfer functions:
Do the following:
For the process given above, can an idealized feedforward controller be used to reject the disturbance.
Obtain a feedforward controller and PID controller for the process above using the unified feedforward-feedback control method.
Furnace ratio control Figure 9
Draw the schematic of a ratio control strategy. What is the target disturbance? What is the manipulated variable? What is the controlled variable?
Wastewater pH neutralization Figure 11
Devise a ratio control strategy to provide desired flow rate of NaOH solution to maintain the pH of the effluent.
Citation
@online{utikar2023,
author = {Utikar, Ranjeet},
title = {Feedforward and Ratio Control},
date = {2023-07-30},
url = {https://amc.smilelab.dev/content/notes/02-ratio_and_feedforward_control/in-class-activities.html},
langid = {en}
}